When my 9 a.m. interview was canceled because of the monumental heaps of fluffy white crystals blanketing the city, I found myself on the Upper East Side with nothing to do.
My friend Kate, who teaches in the neighborhood, was similarly free thanks to Cathie Black's fortuitous announcement, so we decided on the only logical course of action: a snowman-sculpting contest in the Park.
Kate shaped a paired sculpture of a rotund gentleman with walrus mustache and bow tie, holding the leash of an adoring puppy seated at his feet. I chose to create a Daumier-style caricature bust of an elderly man with a large hooked nose, bushy eyebrows, and sunken cheeks. Our efforts attracted a crowd of onlookers, eager to snap pictures and admire our handiwork.
After about 45 minutes, I added my tag to the sculpture, and we went on our merry way. If by chance this inspired you to google my website, please let me know in the comments section below! I will mail you a cookie.
Thursday, January 27, 2011
Monday, January 10, 2011
Rethinking the Museum Tour
![]() |
| Isamu Noguchi, Core (Cored Sculpture) |
So far, the focus has been on conducting meaningful tours for adults, a challenging and thought-provoking endeavor.
During our conversations the majority of the participants, including me, copped to the fact that we generally avoid museum tours when we visit our peer institutions. Most of us, as artists and art historians familiar with the process of critical analysis, prefer not to be spoon-fed the information that stereotypically constitutes such an encounter. Our collective goal in the training, therefore, was to explore what a tour informed by current best practices would look like. In a nutshell, the aim is an open-ended discussion in which the tour guide serves more as a fellow learner and conduit for visitor experiences than as a teacher.
To this end, we've observed tours by expert educators Georgia Krantz at the Guggenheim and Rika Burnham at the Frick Collection, as well as reading articles on the subject by leading voices in the field, including Burnham, George Hein, and Cheryl Mezaros. Today we had the opportunity to field-test some of our new techniques, albeit for an audience of fellow museum educators.
Personally, I found it tough to break out of "instruction mode," especially after working with children for so long, but I'm confident that practicing these techniques will be worthwhile.
Monday, December 20, 2010
Project: Website
One of my recent projects, besides volunteering for LTA, art tutoring, and other miscellaneous creative gigs undertaken for fun and profit, has been getting my personal website up and running. The site has a great design, imagined and executed for me by the multi-talented Nikita Golitsyn more than two years ago, but I'm ashamed to say that it hasn't seen the light of day since summer 2008, mostly because of the rigors of grad school.
With academia behind me, I thought it was high time that I made my art a priority again. But this undertaking has challenges of its own.
For one thing, which types of art should appear on the website? While I'm happy with all of the pieces I originally chose to use, much of the work does not represent the directions that I'm currently taking. Once I've photographed and uploaded more recent pieces, will earlier ones need to go? Another concern is the design itself. I'm still interested in creating fractal-based abstractions, but do the twisted, tree-like shapes of my earlier work mesh with different kinds of forms? (See for example Hungry Dragon and Clever Mouse, pictured above, an early precursor to my current work.)
Besides conceptual concerns, there are of course the mundane details of website maintenance: do all of the links work? Are the pages titled properly? I'm still ironing these issues out with help from Nikita, but hope to have the bulk of it complete by early 2011.
Visit the page at http://www.phylandart.com for updates.
With academia behind me, I thought it was high time that I made my art a priority again. But this undertaking has challenges of its own.
For one thing, which types of art should appear on the website? While I'm happy with all of the pieces I originally chose to use, much of the work does not represent the directions that I'm currently taking. Once I've photographed and uploaded more recent pieces, will earlier ones need to go? Another concern is the design itself. I'm still interested in creating fractal-based abstractions, but do the twisted, tree-like shapes of my earlier work mesh with different kinds of forms? (See for example Hungry Dragon and Clever Mouse, pictured above, an early precursor to my current work.)
Besides conceptual concerns, there are of course the mundane details of website maintenance: do all of the links work? Are the pages titled properly? I'm still ironing these issues out with help from Nikita, but hope to have the bulk of it complete by early 2011.
Visit the page at http://www.phylandart.com for updates.
Saturday, December 4, 2010
AbEx New York
![]() |
| Robert Motherwell, Pancho Villa, Dead and Alive |
But that's just the fourth floor.
The two related exhibits on the second and third floors ("Rock Paper Scissors" and "Ideas Not Theories", respectively, on view through February 28) are intimate, thoughtfully curated explorations, showcasing works by artists who do not receive the big-ticket treatment as frequently, if ever. "Rock Paper Scissors" in particular is a delight. Located in the Prints and Illustrated Books gallery, the show is cohesive and well-suited to the space, which is ideal for close observation of the pieces.
The pairing of small and mid-size sculpture with drawings and prints ties the exhibit together beautifully, allowing viewers the pleasure of observing how artists like Nevelson, Isamu Noguchi, Dorothy Dehner and Seymour Lipton thought in both two and three dimensions. Some of the scupltures, especially David Hare's Figure Waiting in Cold, are reminiscent of etchings, their delicate metal ribbing inscribing the space around them with short, linear strokes, while many of the works on paper, such as David Smith's drawing Untitled 5/28/55, or Stanley William Hayter's remarkable print Amazon, possess a distinctly sculptural quality. This show deserves points for moving beyond the often-aggressive facade of the abstract expressionist movement and producing an experience that is nothing short of a revelation.
Labels:
abstract expressionism,
David Hare,
David Smith,
de Kooning,
Dehner,
Frankenthaler,
Hartigan,
Hayter,
Joan Mitchell,
Krasner,
Lipton,
MoMA,
museum exhibitions,
Nevelson,
Noguchi,
Pollock,
Rothko
Thursday, November 4, 2010
The Magic of Art
![]() |
| Paul Signac, Portrait of Felix Feneon |
We're two weeks into the classroom sessions now, and the experience has been incredibly rewarding. Both times we've entered the room, our three third-grade classes have given us a reception that this age bracket usually reserves for Santa Claus: gasps, cheering, and applause.
The energy level in the room gets even higher when the lesson starts. Our students are avid aficionados of Picasso and Matisse, and never tire of telling us that they want to be artists when they grow up (we tell them, "you're artists now!"). During the demonstration yesterday, after first seeing the broad strokes they could make with the side of a vine charcoal stick and then seeing how easily the strokes could be wiped away, our classes reacted as if we'd produced the drawings from thin air.
Witnessing moments like that, who could doubt that the arts are a fundamental part of our schools?
Friday, October 29, 2010
Recommended Reading
I'm finally catching up on the recreational reading I postponed during grad school, including Sarah Thornton's excellent ethnographic study, Seven Days in the Art World (released just after the financial meltdown of 2008, in my first semester as a masters student).
The book is a quick read, lively and engrossing, and one that I would thoroughly recommend to anyone with an interest in the contemporary art scene. It's much less about art-making than the plethora of peripheral activities the field comprises, and as such, ought to be required reading for those pursuing a BFA or MFA in visual arts. As a funny, often hubristic, but ultimately humane portrait of the leading personalities and subcultures built around this tiny word, it is like nothing I've read before.
On a related note, Thornton has also written a number of compelling articles for The Economist, among other publications. I was particularly amused by her September article on Damien Hirst, which critiques the British art star's market sense in the same way Randall Lane's July Vanity Fair article skewered washed-up pop artist Peter Max. Both writers observe that creating more of something doesn't make it more valuable, a lesson of which economists and artists alike should take note.
All three pieces offer intelligent commentary on the heady days before the collapse, seemingly inevitable in hindsight, in which many key players were oblivious to imminent disaster. For this reason, there's actually a shred of pathos in these accounts, although there's hubris a-plenty as well.
The book is a quick read, lively and engrossing, and one that I would thoroughly recommend to anyone with an interest in the contemporary art scene. It's much less about art-making than the plethora of peripheral activities the field comprises, and as such, ought to be required reading for those pursuing a BFA or MFA in visual arts. As a funny, often hubristic, but ultimately humane portrait of the leading personalities and subcultures built around this tiny word, it is like nothing I've read before.
On a related note, Thornton has also written a number of compelling articles for The Economist, among other publications. I was particularly amused by her September article on Damien Hirst, which critiques the British art star's market sense in the same way Randall Lane's July Vanity Fair article skewered washed-up pop artist Peter Max. Both writers observe that creating more of something doesn't make it more valuable, a lesson of which economists and artists alike should take note.
All three pieces offer intelligent commentary on the heady days before the collapse, seemingly inevitable in hindsight, in which many key players were oblivious to imminent disaster. For this reason, there's actually a shred of pathos in these accounts, although there's hubris a-plenty as well.
Tuesday, October 19, 2010
What's In A Name?
![]() |
| The Mandelbrot set |
My own interest in the topic, which developed while I was studying painting at Boston University, is the reason for the title of this blog. Fractals describe the shape of the world we live in, from the microscopic beauty of an individual snow crystal to the epic grandeur of growing nebulae. The study of fractals is fundamentally about the recognition of patterns in seemingly random forms and events, and I believe that this principle applies equally to art.
Fractal patterning continues to play a major role in my drawings and paintings, and for this I owe a debt of gratitude to Dr. Mandelbrot and the countless other scientists and mathematicians who work in this field. I am particularly grateful for publications such as Exploring Chaos (ed. Nina Hall), now quite outdated at nearly 20 years old, that dissect these phenomena for a general audience.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






